Critique 2010: Shutter Island (* *)
NOTE: 7.50
This film, I think, that Argentina had an advantage that will certainly raise more viewers, and that advantage is here I put "Shutter Island", then the film is full of horror fans, who expected to see a bloody movie, but were disappointed. Although in truth I'm scared in parts (although it should be noted that I get scared easily). What's more, in part I nearly fell off my chair, haha!.
Martin Scorssese
As I think is his best film not even close. You is very overshadowed by his recent hit "The Departed" which took the prize more. I did not go with high hopes to see this movie, so do not disappoint me too, but certainly expected more. I think it's an issue that can take over. Which can be exploited more than they are exploded. You think the characters in the psychiatric (With this I mean crazy) are not worked, rather than disappoint the Scorssese, could haverlos made deeper, lunatics, much better than fue.Por his part, Di Caprio, gives us a good performance, but I do not achieve the Oscar nomination. While his performance is good, is not the best, not perfect. Mark Ruffalo I thought it was great, one of the best performances, hurt that his character is not well refined. Then we see very good performances such as Patricia Clarkson, Michelle Williams (of course, very good) and Ben Kingsley gives a better flavor to the film.
The soundtrack
seemed horrible, and this is rare, I usually always like movie soundtracks. I turned out like a cheap horror movie, a group trying to sound scary, it seemed inadequate.
Some scenes seemed too harsh, but that's because I do not like scenes where you see people maimed or dead children. I find it very hard. But I applaud the film photography, which together with the technical (editing, sound editing sound, editing) are the best of the film.
The ending is predictable from me half of the film. Although not entirely clear you is a good ending. I thought the film back a little at the end.
In conclusion, I believe that the beginning and the end of the film were the best, refirendome to the plot, which development is dense and very loose half. But anyway the end, I do not want to tell, lets you questions, and you thought that there are things may not have happened, I mean, I think it was so worked, because it is not well understood. I left the theater wondering, "then all these dialogues do not exist?. That's what I like.
Best: the technical and photography
The worst: the development plot and the script could have been better.
